Dealing with an Irritable Child Using the Behaviorist Theory Essay

Dealing with an Irritable Child Using the behavioristic hypothesis - Essay ExampleHence, behaviorism is also sometimes called the Stimulus-Response or S-R Theory. Since learning is developed to become a reflex action, Behaviorism largely works under the mechanics of Classical Conditioning. Classical conditioning has fundamental requirements in order to be effective. The first of these is contiguity, which refers to the degree of association between the reinforcer and the behavior that is being aimed at (Klein, 2011). Contiguity plays an authorised role in conditioning because it is what connects the stimulation and the consequent response that is hoped to achieve (Gordon & Browne, 2010). Next, conditioning will be effective only if there is sufficient frequency at which the behavior is being drawn out. The demand response will only become automatic upon application of stimulus if S-R bonds pitch been established umteen times before (Klein, 2011). Finally, the required behavi or will be achieved by classical conditioning if the comely reinforcement is applied. Reinforcement is the mechanism used to increase the chances that the response that preceded it will occur again (Klein, 2011). in that location are different kinds of reinforcements in terms of their desirability. First, positive reinforcement is a pleasant stimulus that aims to lace a response if it is given after the response occurs. For example, offering a child candy for winning out the trash is positive reinforcement. On the other hand, negative reinforcement is the removal of an undesirable stimulus after a response (Gordon & Browne, 2010). For example, excusing a child from household chores because of good grades in school demonstrates a negative reinforcement. Both positive and negative reinforcements fortifies or reinforces the response that preceded the reinforcement. Unlike reinforcements, a punishment decreases the point of a response because of the introduction of an undesirable s timulus following the response (Klein, 2011). It should be noted that the Behaviorist Theory needs to satisfy certain assumptions and implications. Proponents of the Behaviorist Learning Theory believe that human stupefy as a blank slate, one that needs to be filled with programmed responses to certain stimuli (Gordon & Browne, 2010). In addition, behaviorists have modeled a strongly deterministic theory of learning. However, one should keep in mind that patch behaviorist strategies may apply without failure on animals, animal behavior is becalm very often different from human behavior in terms of thoughts, ideas, emotions, and feelings (O Boyle, 2006). II. Proponents of the Behaviorist Theory The different proponents of Behaviorist Theory include B. F. Skinner, Ivan Pavlov, and John B. Watson. B. F. Skinner was the more or less significant contributor to the Behaviorist Theory. He fashioned numeric and scientific experiments that would prove the premises of Behaviorism (Taylo r, 2008). His vast research on operant conditioning is still being widely used today and is considered as a main authority in the field. Ivan Pavlov is most notable in the Behaviorist circle for his conditioning experiments. One of his experiments included ringing a buzzer and accompanying the ringing bell with food powder which made a dog salivate (Lefrancois, 2011). later on, even without the food powder, the dog would salivate upon hearing the bell ring. John